Rizon Visa Card vs Solid Card: which wins?
Cashback, annual fee, FX and ATM charges, custody and country availability — both cards on the same fields, taken from each issuer's published terms; each card page shows when its data was last verified.
How we rate them
Our own assessment, not a user rating — four criteria at 25% each, scored against each issuer's published terms. See the scoring model.
Solid is a strong self-custody debit card, and its Wirex rollout opens it to the UK and the whole EU. Its 3% Core cashback in USDC needs no staking, and Prime's 4% can be reached by holding a Savings balance rather than locking tokens. The trade-offs are the $50/$100/$200 monthly cashback caps, a 2% total FX cost on non-USD purchases at Core, and a virtual-only card with no ATM access.
Who wins on what
- HIGHER HEADLINE CASHBACKSolid CardUp to 5% vs Up to 2.5%
- CHEAPER TO HOLDRizon Visa Cardno annual fee vs
- NO TOKEN LOCK-UPRizon Visa Cardheadline rate without staking
Only stated where the published data supports it. A card with a tiered or conditional fee is not counted as free.
How they actually differ
- Rizon Visa Card is a prepaid card while Solid Card is a debit card — that changes how you fund it, not just what it pays.
- Rewards arrive in different assets: RizPoints (gamified) on the Rizon Visa Card, USDC on the Solid Card.
Rizon Visa Card vs Solid Card, side by side
A dash means the issuer has not published that figure — it does not mean zero. See our methodology for how each field is verified. Rewards and availability change often and vary by region. Not financial advice.